Party warns of increased crime risk, while government and PSIRA defend tighter regulations
The Democratic Alliance (DA) has raised strong objections to proposed amendments to South Africa’s firearm regulations, warning that the changes could compromise public safety and hamper the effectiveness of private security services.
The party has called for the immediate withdrawal of the draft regulations, arguing that they could leave households, communities, and businesses more vulnerable to crime. According to government, the proposed amendments are intended to tighten firearm controls and restrict the use of certain types of weapons in an effort to improve public safety.
However, DA spokesperson on policing matters Ian Cameron believes the changes could have unintended consequences—especially in high-risk areas where private security plays a crucial role.
“These proposals would disarm security guards and restrict non-lethal weapons. The vague rules on ammunition and firearm use create legal uncertainty, while banning key equipment like rubber bullets and tasers,” Cameron said.
He further warned, “This jeopardises public and even officer safety. The DA calls for these amendments to be withdrawn and urges meaningful consultation to safeguard public security.”
The DA has launched a public petition to oppose the draft regulations and push for broader engagement with affected stakeholders.
In response to growing concerns, the Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority (PSIRA) has rejected claims that the amendments would hinder private security operations. The authority maintains that the proposed changes will not obstruct the work of legitimate security providers.
The debate around the proposed legislation is expected to intensify in the coming weeks, as both civil society and the private security sector weigh in on the potential impact.