A controversial proposal to officially change South Africa’s name to the Republic of Azania has ignited widespread debate across the country and online platforms.
The African Transformation Movement (ATM), backed by several smaller political parties, is preparing to table the proposal before Parliament and the Constitutional Review Committee. ATM leader Vuyo Zungula argues that the name “South Africa” is a colonial construct that fails to represent the true heritage and identity of its people.
“Before 1652, there was no South Africa,” said Zungula. “The term emerged with the creation of the Union of South Africa—an institution of colonial control. We need a name that reflects our own cultural identity, not one imposed by colonisers.”
Zungula likened the move to other historical name changes, such as South West Africa becoming Namibia, emphasizing the need to reclaim national pride and cultural autonomy.
However, the proposal has drawn criticism from some quarters. Political analyst Kenneth Mokgatlhe cautioned against the idea, noting that “South Africa” functions as a neutral geographical label, similar to other nations like North Macedonia, South Sudan, and the Central African Republic.
He also questioned the relevance of the name “Azania,” arguing that it is not commonly used or embraced by the broader public. “It may carry symbolic meaning in academic or radical circles, but it lacks strong cultural or historical resonance with most South Africans,” Mokgatlhe said.
The proposal has stirred passionate reactions, highlighting deep-seated questions about identity, history, and post-colonial transformation. While the path forward remains uncertain, the conversation about what the country should be called—and what that name represents—has clearly been reignited.